Give more guidance on how invalid events should be handled.
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f5ebe33a9c
commit
07716711f1
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -21,8 +21,10 @@ even support these by default. One common additional feature is handling
|
||||||
## Proposal
|
## Proposal
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In a future room version, homeserver implementations are to strictly enforce
|
In a future room version, homeserver implementations are to strictly enforce
|
||||||
the JSON compliance of the Canonical JSON specification for events. Events that
|
the JSON compliance of the Canonical JSON specification for events.
|
||||||
do not abide by these rules should be treated like any other bad JSON value.
|
Non-compliant events should be treated like any other malformed event,
|
||||||
|
for example by rejecting the request with an HTTP 400 error with `M_BAD_JSON`,
|
||||||
|
or by discarding the event.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The rationale for doing this in a future room version is to avoid a split brain
|
The rationale for doing this in a future room version is to avoid a split brain
|
||||||
room -- where some federated servers believe an event is valid and others reject
|
room -- where some federated servers believe an event is valid and others reject
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue