Wording fixes

This commit is contained in:
Hubert Chathi 2020-05-18 11:22:51 -04:00 committed by GitHub
parent 4672a7083e
commit 2e0ef11640
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View file

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ types are already described in [MSC2241 (Key verification in
DMs)](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2241). This proposal adds DMs)](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2241). This proposal adds
them to verifications in to-device messages. them to verifications in to-device messages.
The first event type is `m.key.verification.ready`, which may be sent by the The first event type is `m.key.verification.ready`, which must be sent by the
target of the `m.key.verification.request` message, upon receipt of the target of the `m.key.verification.request` message, upon receipt of the
`m.key.verification.request` event. It has the fields: `m.key.verification.request` event. It has the fields:
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ After the `m.key.verification.ready` event is sent, either party can send an
`m.key.verification.start` event to begin the verification. If both parties `m.key.verification.start` event to begin the verification. If both parties
send an `m.key.verification.start` event, and they both specify the same send an `m.key.verification.start` event, and they both specify the same
verification method, then the event sent by the user whose user ID is the verification method, then the event sent by the user whose user ID is the
smallest is used, and the other `m.key.verification.start` event is ignored. lexicographically smallest is used, and the other `m.key.verification.start` event is ignored.
In the case of a single user verifying two of their devices, the device ID is In the case of a single user verifying two of their devices, the device ID is
compared instead. If both parties send an `m.key.verification.start` event, compared instead. If both parties send an `m.key.verification.start` event,
but they specify different verification methods, the verification should be but they specify different verification methods, the verification should be