Words on using m.login.dummy for disambiguation
Add some text on how m.login.dummy can be used to distinguish a flow that would otherwise be a subset of other flows.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ba18a6e9fa
commit
383e02835e
1 changed files with 8 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -789,7 +789,14 @@ Dummy Auth
|
|||
:Description:
|
||||
Dummy authentication always succeeds and requires no extra parameters. Its
|
||||
purpose is to allow servers to not require any form of User-Interactive
|
||||
Authentication to perform a request.
|
||||
Authentication to perform a request. It can also be used to differentiate
|
||||
flows where otherwise one flow would be a subset of another flow. eg. if
|
||||
a server offers flows ``m.login.recaptcha`` and ``m.login.recaptcha,
|
||||
m.login.email.identity`` and the client completes the recaptcha stage first,
|
||||
the auth would succeed with the former flow, even if the client was intending
|
||||
to then complete the email auth stage. A server can instead send flows
|
||||
``m.login.recaptcha, m.login.dummy`` and ``m.login.recaptcha,
|
||||
m.login.email.identity`` to fix the ambiguity.
|
||||
|
||||
To use this authentication type, clients should submit an auth dict with just
|
||||
the type and session, if provided:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue