A few notes on how we could do state resolution of auth events
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b76181f74
commit
406742afaa
1 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -171,6 +171,21 @@ pick the one with the greatest:
|
|||
#. Hash of event_id.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
This works except in the case of auth events, where we need to mitigate against
|
||||
the attack where servers artificially netsplit to avoid bans or power level
|
||||
changes.
|
||||
|
||||
We want the following rules to apply:
|
||||
|
||||
- If power levels have been changed on two different branches use the rules
|
||||
above, ensuring that the one picked is a valid change from the one not picked.
|
||||
- Similarly handle membership changes (e.g. bans, kicks, etc.)
|
||||
- If a power level has been changed in a branch, then any state merged from the
|
||||
other branch *must* be allowed by the power level event change. Otherwise,
|
||||
use the current one from the branch where the power level event changed.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
State Conflict Resolution
|
||||
-------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue