Clarify wording per review suggestions
This commit is contained in:
parent
a15fe3723d
commit
54102b8d36
1 changed files with 8 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -382,17 +382,16 @@ in some cases the MSC itself will be small enough to be considered proven. Where
|
||||||
unclear if a MSC will require an implementation proof, ask in `#matrix-spec:matrix.org
|
unclear if a MSC will require an implementation proof, ask in `#matrix-spec:matrix.org
|
||||||
<https://matrix.to/#/#matrix-spec:matrix.org>`_.
|
<https://matrix.to/#/#matrix-spec:matrix.org>`_.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Early adoption of a MSC/idea
|
Early release of a MSC/idea
|
||||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To help facilitate early releases of software dependent on a spec release, implementations
|
To help facilitate early releases of software dependent on a spec release, implementations
|
||||||
are required to use the following process to ensure that the official Matrix namespace
|
are required to use the following process to ensure that the official Matrix namespace
|
||||||
is not cluttered with development or testing data.
|
is not cluttered with development or testing data.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. Note::
|
.. Note::
|
||||||
Proof of concept implementations that are solely left on a branch/unreleased and for
|
Proof of concept implementations that are solely left on a branch/unreleased for
|
||||||
demonstrating that a particular MSC works do not have to follow this. Note that the
|
demonstrating that a particular MSC works do not have to follow this.
|
||||||
``develop`` branch adopted by some projects is still subject to this process.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The process for an implementation willing to be ahead of a spec release is:
|
The process for an implementation willing to be ahead of a spec release is:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -404,9 +403,9 @@ The process for an implementation willing to be ahead of a spec release is:
|
||||||
`/_matrix/client/unstable/com.example/login`. Vendor prefixes throughout Matrix
|
`/_matrix/client/unstable/com.example/login`. Vendor prefixes throughout Matrix
|
||||||
always use the Java package naming convention. The MSC for the feature should
|
always use the Java package naming convention. The MSC for the feature should
|
||||||
identify which preferred vendor prefix is to be used by early adopters.
|
identify which preferred vendor prefix is to be used by early adopters.
|
||||||
* Unstable endpoints **do not** inherit from stable (e.g. `/r0`) APIs. Implementations
|
* Note that unstable namespaces do not automatically inherit endpoints from stable
|
||||||
cannot assume that a particular endpoint will exist in the unstable namespace
|
namespaces: for example, the fact that ``/_matrix/client/r0/sync`` exists does
|
||||||
even if the server advertises support for the feature.
|
not imply that ``/_matrix/client/unstable/com.example/sync`` exists.
|
||||||
* If the client needs to be sure the server supports the feature, an unstable
|
* If the client needs to be sure the server supports the feature, an unstable
|
||||||
feature flag that MUST be vendor prefixed is to be used. This kind of flag shows
|
feature flag that MUST be vendor prefixed is to be used. This kind of flag shows
|
||||||
up in the ``unstable_features`` section of ``/versions`` as, for example,
|
up in the ``unstable_features`` section of ``/versions`` as, for example,
|
||||||
|
@ -431,7 +430,7 @@ The process for an implementation willing to be ahead of a spec release is:
|
||||||
working as proposed. A typical example of this is an implementation of the MSC,
|
working as proposed. A typical example of this is an implementation of the MSC,
|
||||||
though the implementation does not need to be shipped anywhere and can therefore
|
though the implementation does not need to be shipped anywhere and can therefore
|
||||||
avoid the forwards/backwards compatibility concerns mentioned here.
|
avoid the forwards/backwards compatibility concerns mentioned here.
|
||||||
5. FCP is gone through, and assuming nothing is flagged the MSC lands.
|
5. The FCP process is completed, and assuming nothing is flagged the MSC lands.
|
||||||
6. A spec PR is written to incorporate the changes into Matrix.
|
6. A spec PR is written to incorporate the changes into Matrix.
|
||||||
7. A spec release happens.
|
7. A spec release happens.
|
||||||
8. Implementations switch to using stable prefixes (e.g.: ``/r0``) if the server
|
8. Implementations switch to using stable prefixes (e.g.: ``/r0``) if the server
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue