Conflicted state set is a set of events (#1120)
In #1042 I incorrectly wrote that the conflicted state set is a set of pairs (K, V). We later take the union of the conflicted state set and the auth difference. The latter is a set of events (V) only. Fix this by making the conflicted state set a set of events rather than a set of pairs. That is, the conflicted state set is a a `Set[Event]` instead of a `Set[((type, state key), event)]`.
This commit is contained in:
parent
cbdd889fa8
commit
580be61df7
2 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
Improve readability and understanding of the state resolution algorithms.
|
|
@ -36,10 +36,10 @@ The key-value pairs (*K*, *V*) across all state maps *S<sub>i</sub>* can be
|
|||
divided into two collections.
|
||||
If a given key *K* is present in every *S<sub>i</sub>* with the same value *V*
|
||||
in each state map, then the pair (*K*, *V*) belongs to the *unconflicted state map*.
|
||||
Otherwise (*K*, *V*) belongs to the *conflicted state set*.
|
||||
Otherwise, *V* belongs to the *conflicted state set*.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the unconflicted state map only has one event for each key *K*,
|
||||
whereas the conflicted state set may associate multiple events to the same key.
|
||||
whereas the conflicted state set may contain multiple events with the same key.
|
||||
|
||||
**Auth chain.**
|
||||
The *auth chain* of an event *E* is the set containing all of *E*'s auth events,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue