From 7aeca9ccb64de17c25de32ed2c28ae37bea393cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick Cloke Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 08:35:31 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo. Co-authored-by: Matthew Hodgson --- proposals/3083-restricted-rooms.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/proposals/3083-restricted-rooms.md b/proposals/3083-restricted-rooms.md index b9e3660e..60d54290 100644 --- a/proposals/3083-restricted-rooms.md +++ b/proposals/3083-restricted-rooms.md @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ as the `restricted` join rule value do not need unstable prefixes. It may seem that just having the `allow` key with `public` join rules is enough (as originally suggested in [MSC2962](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2962)), -but there are concerns that changing the behaviour of a pre-existing a `public` +but there are concerns that changing the behaviour of a pre-existing `public` join rule may cause security issues in older implementations (that do not yet understand the new behaviour). This could be solved by introducing a new room version, thus it seems clearer to introduce a new join rule -- `restricted`.