Clarify that the query string is because they are widgets
This commit is contained in:
parent
8b85fda52c
commit
b6f0e8e8ed
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ widget rules apply here.
|
|||
|
||||
The user is able to have multiple integration managers through use of multiple widgets.
|
||||
|
||||
The query string shown in the example is to demonstrate that integration managers are widgets and can
|
||||
make use of the template options provided to widgets.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Display order of integration managers
|
||||
|
||||
Clients which have support for integration managers should display at least 1 manager, but should
|
||||
|
@ -149,6 +152,9 @@ which are already recommended for homeserver discovery in the Client-Server API.
|
|||
however that conflates many concerns together on the one endpoint. A new endpoint is instead proposed
|
||||
to keep the concerns isolated.
|
||||
|
||||
The query string shown in the example is to demonstrate that integration managers are widgets and can
|
||||
make use of the template options provided to widgets.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tradeoffs
|
||||
|
||||
We could limit the user (and by extension, the homeserver and client) to exactly 1 integration manager
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue