Clarify that the query string is because they are widgets
This commit is contained in:
parent
8b85fda52c
commit
b6f0e8e8ed
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ widget rules apply here.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The user is able to have multiple integration managers through use of multiple widgets.
|
The user is able to have multiple integration managers through use of multiple widgets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The query string shown in the example is to demonstrate that integration managers are widgets and can
|
||||||
|
make use of the template options provided to widgets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Display order of integration managers
|
#### Display order of integration managers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Clients which have support for integration managers should display at least 1 manager, but should
|
Clients which have support for integration managers should display at least 1 manager, but should
|
||||||
|
@ -149,6 +152,9 @@ which are already recommended for homeserver discovery in the Client-Server API.
|
||||||
however that conflates many concerns together on the one endpoint. A new endpoint is instead proposed
|
however that conflates many concerns together on the one endpoint. A new endpoint is instead proposed
|
||||||
to keep the concerns isolated.
|
to keep the concerns isolated.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The query string shown in the example is to demonstrate that integration managers are widgets and can
|
||||||
|
make use of the template options provided to widgets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Tradeoffs
|
## Tradeoffs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We could limit the user (and by extension, the homeserver and client) to exactly 1 integration manager
|
We could limit the user (and by extension, the homeserver and client) to exactly 1 integration manager
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue