Merge branch 'master' into rav/refactor_tables
This commit is contained in:
commit
d1c685f296
3 changed files with 161 additions and 6 deletions
142
drafts/markjh_end_to_end.rst
Normal file
142
drafts/markjh_end_to_end.rst
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
|
|||
Goals of Key-Distribution in Matrix
|
||||
===================================
|
||||
|
||||
* No Central Authority: Users should not need to trust a central authority
|
||||
when determining the authenticity of keys.
|
||||
|
||||
* Easy to Add New Devices: It should be easy for a user to start using a
|
||||
new device.
|
||||
|
||||
* Possible to discover MITM: It should be possible for a user to determine if
|
||||
they are being MITM.
|
||||
|
||||
* Lost Devices: It should be possible for a user to recover if they lose all
|
||||
their devices.
|
||||
|
||||
* No Copying Keys: Keys should be per device and shouldn't leave the device
|
||||
they were created on.
|
||||
|
||||
A Possible Mechanism for Key Distribution
|
||||
=========================================
|
||||
|
||||
Basic API for setting up keys on a server:
|
||||
|
||||
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/24
|
||||
|
||||
Client shouldn't trust the keys unless they have been verified, e.g by
|
||||
comparing fingerprints.
|
||||
|
||||
If a user adds a new device it should some yet to be specified protocol
|
||||
communicate with an old device and obtain a cross-signature from the old
|
||||
device for its public key.
|
||||
|
||||
The new device can then present the cross-signed key to all the devices
|
||||
that the user is in conversations with. Those devices should then include
|
||||
the new device into those conversations.
|
||||
|
||||
If the user cannot cross-sign the new key, e.g. because their old device
|
||||
is lost or stolen. Then they will need to reauthenticate their conversations
|
||||
out of band, e.g by comparing fingerprints.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Goals of End-to-end encryption in Matrix
|
||||
========================================
|
||||
|
||||
* Access to Chat History: Users should be able to see the history of a
|
||||
conversation on a new device. User should be able to control who can
|
||||
see their chat history and how much of the chat history they can see.
|
||||
|
||||
* Forward Secrecy of Discarded Chat History: Users should be able to discard
|
||||
history from their device, once they have discarded the history it should be
|
||||
impossible for an adversary to recover that history.
|
||||
|
||||
* Forward Secrecy of Future Messages: Users should be able to recover from
|
||||
disclosure of the chat history on their device.
|
||||
|
||||
* Deniablity of Chat History: It should not be possible to prove to a third
|
||||
party that a given user sent a message.
|
||||
|
||||
* Authenticity of Chat History: It should be possible to prove amoungst
|
||||
the members of a chat that a message sent by a user was authored by that
|
||||
user.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bonus Goals:
|
||||
|
||||
* Traffic Analysis: It would be nice if the protocol was resilient to traffic
|
||||
or metadata analysis. However it's not something we want to persue if it
|
||||
harms the usability of the protocol. It might be cool if there was a
|
||||
way for the user to could specify the trade off between performance and
|
||||
resilience to traffic analysis that they wanted.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
A Possible Design for Group Chat using Olm
|
||||
==========================================
|
||||
|
||||
Protecting the secrecy of history
|
||||
---------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Each message sent by a client has a 32-bit counter. This counter increments
|
||||
by one for each message sent by the client. This counter is used to advance a
|
||||
ratchet. The ratchet is split into a vector four 256-bit values,
|
||||
:math:`R_{n,j}` for :math:`j \in {0,1,2,3}`. The ratchet can be advanced as
|
||||
follows:
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
\begin{align}
|
||||
R_{2^24n,0} &= H_1\left(R_{2^24(i-1),0}\right) \\
|
||||
R_{2^24n,1} &= H_2\left(R_{2^24(i-1),0}\right) \\
|
||||
R_{2^16n,1} &= H_1\left(R_{2^16(i-1),1}\right) \\
|
||||
R_{2^16n,2} &= H_2\left(R_{2^16(i-1),1}\right) \\
|
||||
R_{2^8i,2} &= H_1\left(R_{2^8(i-1),2}\right) \\
|
||||
R_{2^8i,3} &= H_2\left(R_{2^8(i-1),2}\right) \\
|
||||
R_{i,3} &= H_1\left(R_{(i-1),3}\right)
|
||||
\end{align}
|
||||
|
||||
Where :math:`H_1` and :math:`H_2` are different hash functions. For example
|
||||
:math:`H_1` could be :math:`HMAC\left(X,\text{"\textbackslash x01"}\right)` and
|
||||
:math:`H_2` could be :math:`HMAC\left(X,\text{"\textbackslash x02"}\right)`.
|
||||
|
||||
So every :math:`2^24` iterations :math:`R_{n,1}` is reseeded from :math:`R_{n,0}`.
|
||||
Every :math:`2^16` iterations :math:`R_{n,2}` is reseeded from :math:`R_{n,1}`.
|
||||
Every :math:`2^8` iterations :math:`R_{n,3}` is reseeded from :math:`R_{n,2}`.
|
||||
|
||||
This scheme allows the ratchet to be advanced an arbitrary amount forwards
|
||||
while needing only 1024 hash computations.
|
||||
|
||||
This the value of the ratchet is hashed to generate the keys used to encrypt
|
||||
each mesage.
|
||||
|
||||
A client can decrypt chat history onwards from the earliest value of the
|
||||
ratchet it is aware of. But cannot decrypt history from before that point
|
||||
without reversing the hash function.
|
||||
|
||||
This allows a client to share its ability to decrypt chat history with another
|
||||
from a point in the conversation onwards by giving a copy of the ratchet at
|
||||
that point in the conversation.
|
||||
|
||||
A client can discard history by advancing a ratchet to beyond the last message
|
||||
they want to discard and then forgetting all previous values of the ratchet.
|
||||
|
||||
Proving and denying the authenticity of history
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Client sign the messages they send using a Ed25519 key generated per
|
||||
conversation. That key, along with the ratchet key, is distributed
|
||||
to other clients using 1:1 olm ratchets. Those 1:1 ratchets are started using
|
||||
Triple Diffie-Hellman which provides authenticity of the messages to the
|
||||
participants and deniability of the messages to third parties. Therefore
|
||||
any keys shared over those keys inherit the same levels of deniability and
|
||||
authenticity.
|
||||
|
||||
Protecting the secrecy of future messages
|
||||
-----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
A client would need to generate new keys if it wanted to prevent access to
|
||||
messages beyond a given point in the conversation. It must generate new keys
|
||||
whenever someone leaves the room. It should generate new keys periodically
|
||||
anyway.
|
||||
|
||||
The frequency of key generation in a large room may need to be restricted to
|
||||
keep the frequency of messages broadcast over the individual 1:1 channels
|
||||
low.
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"title": "The current membership state of a user in the room.",
|
||||
"description": "Adjusts the membership state for a user in a room. It is preferable to use the membership APIs (``/rooms/<room id>/invite`` etc) when performing membership actions rather than adjusting the state directly as there are a restricted set of valid transformations. For example, user A cannot force user B to join a room, and trying to force this state change directly will fail. \n\nThe ``third_party_invite`` property will be set if this invite is an ``invite`` event and is the successor of an ``m.room.third_party_invite`` event, and absent otherwise.\n\nThis event also includes an ``invite_room_state`` key **outside the** ``content`` **key**. This contains an array of ``StrippedState`` Events. These events provide information on a few select state events such as the room name.",
|
||||
"description": "Adjusts the membership state for a user in a room. It is preferable to use the membership APIs (``/rooms/<room id>/invite`` etc) when performing membership actions rather than adjusting the state directly as there are a restricted set of valid transformations. For example, user A cannot force user B to join a room, and trying to force this state change directly will fail. \n\nThe ``third_party_invite`` property will be set if this invite is an ``invite`` event and is the successor of an ``m.room.third_party_invite`` event, and absent otherwise.\n\nThis event may also include an ``invite_room_state`` key **outside the** ``content`` **key**. If present, this contains an array of ``StrippedState`` Events. These events provide information on a few select state events such as the room name.",
|
||||
"allOf": [{
|
||||
"$ref": "core-event-schema/state_event.json"
|
||||
}],
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -122,10 +122,12 @@ def get_json_schema_object_fields(obj, enforce_title=False, include_parents=Fals
|
|||
"x-pattern", "string"
|
||||
)
|
||||
value_type = "{%s: %s}" % (key, nested_object[0]["title"])
|
||||
value_id = "%s: %s" % (key, nested_object[0]["title"])
|
||||
if not nested_object[0].get("no-table"):
|
||||
tables += nested_object
|
||||
else:
|
||||
value_type = "{string: %s}" % prop_val
|
||||
value_type = "{string: %s}" % (prop_val,)
|
||||
value_id = "string: %s" % (prop_val,)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
nested_object = get_json_schema_object_fields(
|
||||
props[key_name],
|
||||
|
@ -133,6 +135,7 @@ def get_json_schema_object_fields(obj, enforce_title=False, include_parents=Fals
|
|||
include_parents=include_parents,
|
||||
)
|
||||
value_type = "{%s}" % nested_object[0]["title"]
|
||||
value_id = "%s" % (nested_object[0]["title"],)
|
||||
|
||||
if not nested_object[0].get("no-table"):
|
||||
tables += nested_object
|
||||
|
@ -145,12 +148,14 @@ def get_json_schema_object_fields(obj, enforce_title=False, include_parents=Fals
|
|||
include_parents=include_parents,
|
||||
)
|
||||
value_type = "[%s]" % nested_object[0]["title"]
|
||||
value_id = "%s" % (nested_object[0]["title"],)
|
||||
tables += nested_object
|
||||
else:
|
||||
value_type = props[key_name]["items"]["type"]
|
||||
if isinstance(value_type, list):
|
||||
value_type = " or ".join(value_type)
|
||||
value_type = "[%s]" % value_type
|
||||
value_id = "%s" % (value_type,)
|
||||
array_enums = props[key_name]["items"].get("enum")
|
||||
if array_enums:
|
||||
if len(array_enums) > 1:
|
||||
|
@ -164,6 +169,7 @@ def get_json_schema_object_fields(obj, enforce_title=False, include_parents=Fals
|
|||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
value_type = props[key_name]["type"]
|
||||
value_id = props[key_name]["type"]
|
||||
if props[key_name].get("enum"):
|
||||
if len(props[key_name].get("enum")) > 1:
|
||||
value_type = "enum"
|
||||
|
@ -184,6 +190,7 @@ def get_json_schema_object_fields(obj, enforce_title=False, include_parents=Fals
|
|||
fields["rows"].append({
|
||||
"key": key_name,
|
||||
"type": value_type,
|
||||
"id": value_id,
|
||||
"required": required,
|
||||
"desc": desc,
|
||||
"req_str": "**Required.** " if required else ""
|
||||
|
@ -313,10 +320,16 @@ class MatrixUnits(Units):
|
|||
|
||||
if req_tables > 1:
|
||||
for table in req_tables[1:]:
|
||||
nested_key_name = [
|
||||
s["key"] for s in req_tables[0]["rows"] if
|
||||
s["type"] == ("{%s}" % (table["title"],))
|
||||
][0]
|
||||
nested_key_name = {
|
||||
"key": s["key"]
|
||||
for rtable in req_tables
|
||||
for s in rtable["rows"]
|
||||
if s["id"] == table["title"]
|
||||
}.get("key", None)
|
||||
|
||||
if nested_key_name is None:
|
||||
raise Exception("Failed to find table for %r" % (table["title"],))
|
||||
|
||||
for row in table["rows"]:
|
||||
row["key"] = "%s.%s" % (nested_key_name, row["key"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue