Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
11d6e42ee1
commit
d9edb3fdf3
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ decrypt different subsets of the secrets. However, the vast majority of users
|
||||||
do not need this feature.
|
do not need this feature.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This proposal defines how clients should behave if they only wish to support a
|
This proposal defines how clients should behave if they only wish to support a
|
||||||
single key by defining which key clients should use if multiple keys are
|
single key, by defining which key clients should use if multiple keys are
|
||||||
present. It also makes the `name` field in the `m.secret_storage.key.*` events
|
present. It also makes the `name` field in the `m.secret_storage.key.*` events
|
||||||
optional, as this field was mainly added to allow a user to select between
|
optional, as this field was mainly added to allow a user to select between
|
||||||
different keys.
|
different keys.
|
||||||
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ None
|
||||||
## Unstable prefix
|
## Unstable prefix
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
An unstable prefix is not needed for a behaviour change in choosing the key to
|
An unstable prefix is not needed for a behaviour change in choosing the key to
|
||||||
use as there are not event/endpoint changes.
|
use as there are no event/endpoint changes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Some clients already omit the `name` field (notably, matrix-js-sdk
|
Some clients already omit the `name` field (notably, matrix-js-sdk
|
||||||
unintentionally does this -- mea culpa), and this does not seem to be causing
|
unintentionally does this -- mea culpa), and this does not seem to be causing
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue