Reword some of the sentences to make it clearer.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2d9e8ca22
commit
e7599bdf46
1 changed files with 22 additions and 20 deletions
|
@ -9,13 +9,13 @@ Server
|
|||
|
||||
Events
|
||||
------
|
||||
An event is a collection of data (the `payload`) and metadata associated with
|
||||
it to be distributed across servers and is the primary data unit in Matrix.
|
||||
Events are extensible so that clients and servers can add extra fields to the
|
||||
payload or metadata that are not in this specification.
|
||||
An event is a collection of data (the `payload`) and metadata to be distributed
|
||||
across servers and is the primary data unit in Matrix. Events are extensible
|
||||
so that clients and servers can add extra arbitrary fields to both the payload
|
||||
or metadata.
|
||||
|
||||
Events are distributed to interested servers upon creation. Historical events
|
||||
may be requested from servers, though servers are not required to produce all
|
||||
may be requested from servers; servers are not required to produce all
|
||||
or any events requested.
|
||||
|
||||
All events have a metadata `type` field that is used by client and servers to
|
||||
|
@ -23,10 +23,12 @@ determine how the payload should be processed and used. There are a number of
|
|||
types reserved by the protocol for particular uses, but otherwise types may be
|
||||
defined by applications, clients or servers for their own purposes.
|
||||
|
||||
.. TODO : Namespacing of new types.
|
||||
|
||||
Graph
|
||||
~~~~~
|
||||
Each event has a list of zero or more `parent` events. These relations form
|
||||
directed acyclic graphs of events, called `event graphs`. Every event graph has
|
||||
directed acyclic graphs of events called `event graphs`. Every event graph has
|
||||
a single root event.
|
||||
|
||||
Event graphs give a partial ordering of events, i.e. given two events one may
|
||||
|
@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ event is distributed and referenced by later events, they effectively become
|
|||
immutable].
|
||||
|
||||
The payload may also be encrypted by clients, except in the case where the
|
||||
payload need to be interpreted by the servers. A list of event types that
|
||||
payload needs to be interpreted by the servers. A list of event types that
|
||||
cannot have an encrypted payload are given later.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -58,17 +60,17 @@ State
|
|||
-----
|
||||
Event graphs may have meta information associated with them, called `state`.
|
||||
State can be updated over time by servers or clients, subject to
|
||||
authentication.
|
||||
authorisation.
|
||||
|
||||
The state of a graph is split into `sections` that can be atomically updated
|
||||
independently of each other.
|
||||
|
||||
State is stored within the graph itself, and can be computed by looking at the
|
||||
graph in its entirety. Thus we can define the state at a given event to be the
|
||||
state of the sub graph of all events "before" and including that event.
|
||||
graph in its entirety. We define the state at a given event to be the state of
|
||||
the sub graph of all events "before" and including that event.
|
||||
|
||||
Some sections of the state may determine behaviour of the protocol, including
|
||||
authorization and distribution. These sections must not be encrypted.
|
||||
authorisation and distribution. These sections must not be encrypted.
|
||||
|
||||
State Events
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
@ -77,9 +79,8 @@ state events hold all the same properties of events, and are part of the event
|
|||
graph. The payload of the event is the replacement value for the particular
|
||||
section of state being updated.
|
||||
|
||||
State events must also include a `state_key` metadata field, which in
|
||||
conjunction with the type field defines the section of state that is to be
|
||||
updated.
|
||||
State events must also include a `state_key` metadata field. The pair of fields
|
||||
type and state_key uniquely defines the section of state that is to be updated.
|
||||
|
||||
State Resolution
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
@ -87,9 +88,10 @@ A given state section may have multiple state events associated with it in a
|
|||
given graph. A consistent method of selecting which state event takes
|
||||
precedence is therefore required.
|
||||
|
||||
This is done by taking the latest state events, i.e. the set of events that
|
||||
either incomparable or after every other event. A state resolution algorithm is
|
||||
then applied to this set to select one.
|
||||
This is done by taking the latest state events, i.e. the set of events that are
|
||||
either incomparable or after every other event in the graph. A state resolution
|
||||
algorithm is then applied to this set to select the single event that takes
|
||||
precedence.
|
||||
|
||||
The state resolution algorithm must be transitive and not depend on server
|
||||
state, as it must consistently select the same event irrespective of the server
|
||||
|
@ -102,9 +104,9 @@ which set the section to its current value. The state dictionary, like the
|
|||
state itself, depends on the events currently in the graph and so is updated
|
||||
with each new event received.
|
||||
|
||||
Since the sections of the state are defined by a pair of strings that came from
|
||||
the type and state_key of the events that update them, the state dictionary can
|
||||
be defined as a mapping from the pair (type, state_key) to a state event with
|
||||
Since the sections of the state are defined by the pair of strings from the
|
||||
type and state_key of the events that update them, the state dictionary can be
|
||||
defined as a mapping from the pair (type, state_key) to a state event with
|
||||
those values in the graph.
|
||||
|
||||
Deleting State
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue