Mostly this is clarification of the problem domain; it also updates some of the discussion points to reflect my current thinking.
5.8 KiB
MSC1730: Mechanism for redirecting to an alternative server during login
Complex homeserver deployments may consist of several homeserver instances, where the HS to be used for a user session is determined at login time. The HS might be chosen based on any of a number of factors, such as the individual user, or a simple round-robin to load-balance.
One solution to this is for users to log in via a "portal server", which
accepts the login request, and picks the server accordingly. This proposal
suggests adding a field to the /login
response which tells clients which
endpoint they should use for the client-server (C-S) API after login.
Proposal
The response to POST /_matrix/client/r0/login
currently includes the fields
user_id
, access_token
, device_id
, and the deprecated home_server
.
We should add to this a base_cs_url
field, which SHOULD be returned by
compliant homeservers, which gives a base URL for the client-server API.
As with
.well-known,
clients would then add /_matrix/client/...
to this URL to form valid C-S
endpoints.
One way that this could be used is that the portal server proxies the /login
request, and passes it on to the target HS, as shown in the sequence diagram below:
Alternatively, the portal server could redirect the original login
request to
the target HS with a 307 Temporary Redirect
response:
(Note that the deprecated home_server
field gives the server_name
of the
relevant homeserver, which may be quite different to the location of the C-S
API, so is not of use here. Further we cannot repurpose it, because (a) this
might break existing clients; (b) it spells homeserver wrong.)
Notes on proxying vs redirecting
Proxying the /login
request as shown in the first sequence diagram above
leads to the following concerns:
-
The target homeserver sees the request coming from the portal server rather than the client, so that the wrong IP address will be recorded against the user's session. (This might be a problem for, for example, IP locking the session, and might affect the
last_seen_ip
field returned byGET /_matrix/client/r0/devices
.)This can be mitigated to some extent via the use of an
X-Forwarded-For
header, but that then requires the portal server to authenticate itself with the target homeserver in some way. -
It causes additional complexity in the portal server, which must now be responsible for making outbound HTTP requests.
-
It potentially leads to a privacy leak, since the portal server could snoop on the returned access token. (Given that the portal server must be trusted to some extent in this architecture, it is unclear how much of a concern this really is.)
On the other hand, redirecting it with a 307
response may reduce flexibility,
or require more state to be managed on the portal server [1]. Furthermore
support for 307
redirects among user-agents may vary
(RFC2616 said "If the 307
status code is received in response to a request other than GET or HEAD, the
user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the request unless it can be
confirmed by the user", though this appears to have been dropped by
RFC7231 and I am unaware
of any current browsers which do not follow 307
redirects.)
In any case, this is an implementation decision; portal servers can use whichever method best suits their needs.
Tradeoffs
Alternative solutions might include:
Proxy all C-S endpoints
It would be possible for the portal to proxy all C-S interaction, as well as
/login
, directing requests to the right server for the user.
This is unsatisfactory due to the additional latency imposed, the load on the portal server, and the fact that it makes the portal a single point of failure for the entire system.
Perform a .well-known lookup after login
Once clients know the server name of the homeserver they should be using
(having extracted it from the /login
response), they could perform a
.well-known
lookup on the target server to locate its C-S API.
This has the advantage of reusing existing mechanisms, but has the following problems:
-
Clients are currently required to do a
.well-known
lookup before login, so that they can find the correct endpoint for the/login
API. That means they will have to do two.well-known
lookups - one before and one after login.This adds latency and overhead, and complicates client implementations.
-
It complicates deployment, since each target server has to support a
.well-known
lookup. (This is somewhat weak: target servers should support.well-known
lookups anyway.)
Add an alternative redirection mechanism in the login flow
We could specify that the /login
response could contain a redirect
field
property instead of the existing user_id
/access_token
/device_id
properties. The redirect
property would give the C-S API of the target
HS. The client would then repeat its /login
request, and use the specified
endpoint for all future C-S interaction.
This approach would complicate client implementations.
[1] The reason more state is needed is as follows: because the portal is now
redirecting the login rather than proxying it, it cannot modify the login
dictionary. This is a problem for the single-sign-on flow, which culminates in
an m.login.token
login. The only way that the portal can identify a given
user session - and thus know where to redirect to - is via the login token, and
of course, it cannot modify that token without making it invalid for the target
HS. It therefore has to use the login token as a session identifier, and store
session state..